SportsMemorabilia.com Proves Google Panda Didn’t Work

sportsmemorabilia.com logo

Last night I found out about SportsMemorabilia.com and it’s nearly $20M business. Mike Berkens pointed out the Inc article and, like every other E-preneur, my eyes glazed, daydreaming about my web properties and wondering if they will ever gross 1M in their lifetime (probably), let alone 20M in a year.

In the Inc article, Mr. Stein instructed his team to pursue an aggressive SEO strategy in order to outrank his competitors. Since I’m an SEO geek (aka Consultant–yes, that’s a shameless plug), I always try and reverse engineer what other successful websites have done in order to learn lessons for my own sites.

And what did I learn? Well, for one, Bill Simmons greatly contributed to SportsMemorabilia’s amazing rankings. For another, SportsMemorabilia.com has some savvy people working their marketing. They offer discounts to University Alumni. This has landed them many very solid, EDU backlinks. They also have a fairly extensive network of websites, interlinking amongst each other in… well, let’s not get into that ;-)

For the most part, great marketing strategy.

But what else did I learn? Google Panda is awful at what it does.

sportsmemorabilia.com backlink profile

SportsMemorabilia.com Backlink Profile

Google Panda vs SportsMemorabilia.com

According to Amit Singhal, Google Panda is designed with this in mind: “Our site quality algorithms are aimed at helping people find “high-quality” sites by reducing the rankings of low-quality content”

OK. Fair enough. And truthfully, I think it has worked, more or less. Yes, many high(ish) quality sites got hit, but the overall level of junk in the top 10 of the SERPs has significantly diminished.

How is it that Google Panda analyzes a site? Well, again, in Google’s words:

  • Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
  • Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
  • Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?

Fair enough. Let’s logically break this down. We’ll start at the bottom. Clearly, anyone would feel comfortable giving their credit card to SportsMemorabilia.com. It is a category killing domain name, well designed, good User Experience etc.

But when you dig deeper, you’ll clearly see that every other element of SportsMemorabilia fails the Panda snuff test.

In the Inc article, Mr. Tesoriero, the CEO, states “We started the company by creating content that was meant for actual human consumption–not just stuff that was meant for Google.

Perfect. That’s what we all strive to do as SEOs, content marketers etc. And for them to be thinking about this in 2006, before the days of Panda and fluff content… Wow. They were wayyy ahead of the curve. Being a huge sports fan (and Nuggets fan), I naturally wanted to devour their content that was meant for actual human consumption. I was ravenous for it.

Here’s the Nuggets page.

And here’s what it says:

Paragraph 1, first sentence: Based in Denver, Colorado, the Denver Nuggets are professional basketball team that is playing in the National Basketball Association

OK. Not exactly PEN/ESPN Literary award writing caliber, but it’s an intro sentence.

Paragraph 2, first two sentences: Denver Nuggets is a professional basketball team having office at Denver, Colorado. This team is playing in Northwest Division of Western Conference.

OK. WTF. First, isn’t that exactly what the first sentence says, more or less? And secondly, how is that anything other than search engine written garbage?

Here’s another gem from that paragraph: Owner of Denver Nuggets is E. Stanley Kroenke and head coach is George Karl. Nuggets team is also known as the successful team for winning more league matches. This is the team won conference titles for 1 time and division titles for 10 times.

Paragraph 3, first few sentences: There are many big players came from this team and Carmelo Anthony is one of them. those who are fan of Carmelo Anthony can visit online store to buy products signed by him. If you are in the list of fans and looking to enhance your collection then you can buy Carmelo Anthony autographed basketball.

GIVE ME A BREAK. What is this? You are peddling trash. Content meant for (dumb) search engine algorithms. Not humans. Not only is it written for search engines, but it was probably outsourced to the Phillipines for $5 per 1,000 words and meant to fill up your website.

And wanna know what else? It’s not meant for human eyes. It’s at the bottom of the page. In 11px font.

You wanna see SEO content made for humans? Not search engines? Check out Zappos. That’s how it’s done.

Screenshot of SportsMemorabilia's Denver Nuggets Page

Screenshot of SportsMemorabilia’s Denver Nuggets Page (February 5th, 2013)

Why am I Doing This?

Well, for one, Google Panda clearly got it wrong. Sports Memorabilia writes $5/1,000 word content. It was written for algorithms, not humans.

But can you blame them? The fact is, most of the content was probably written in pre-Panda days. Days when you COULD’ve and SHOULD’ve written content for search engines. It was easy to game the system. Handsomely profitable. And somehow, most likely because of an epic backlink profile that was brilliantly constructed, Google Panda missed them.

And the site is still well designed. Has a good user experience. I’d buy a signed jersey from them, if I was in the market.

Listen, you can dig up plenty of dirt on me and my sites. Hell, even my Glacier site has content that is poorly written (It had WAYYY more poorly written/SEO content but I’ve since rewritten the vast majority of it).

All SEOs have skeletons in their closet. I visibly display some of mine in my traffic reports. In the past, I’ve peddled the same garbage on EDU lead generation websites. And it worked. And made me a nice chunk of change.

But don’t go touting yourselves as all high and mighty and having the foresight to develop excellent content for humans when you followed the same path as every other company out there. Yes, you smartly acquired a category killing domain name for 12.5k back in 2006. That domain is probably worth mid 6 to 7 figures now.

And you built a great business on top of it.

But, SportsMemorabilia.com, somehow Panda missed you. And sooner or later, a new sports memorabilia business will rise up on the Internet and write real content meant for sports enthusiasts. And they will get links from Universities. And market excellent content to Bill Simmons. And he will link to them. And, if they begin by buying a domain name for 12.5k, they too will get links from DNJournal and a few other domainer websites. And they will squash you.

(But I won’t be that person…

Oh, and congrats on such tremendous growth. It’s still an awesome success story).

Update and Disclosure: Jon Haver over at AuthorityWebsiteIncome.com posted a follow-up to this story and included an image of SportsMemorabilia.com’s traffic levels with a note of where Panda occurred. The image, which is below, clearly shows that SportsMemorabilia did suffer from Panda. And for some reason they still have not cleaned up their garbage content or made any real attempt at recovering from Panda.

Maybe they should hire an SEO consultant? :-)

PS. Interesting to see such a massive spike in traffic in January 2010. Not in the mood to dig into this any further, but I bet someone out there can get to the bottom of it…

sportsmemorabilia.com's traffic levels and panda

Courtest of Jon at AuthorityWebsiteIncome.com

That's Me!

Yup! That's me. Perry Rosenbloom. And I'm smiling because I know you're going to succeed online, too... especially if you sign up for my newsletter right below...

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Brian @ Backlinko February 5, 2013 at 4:31 pm

Interesting case study, Perry.

Like all filters, some low quality sites slip through the cracks.

A few thoughts:

1. Something I’ve suspected about Panda for years is that links are part of the filter.

If you look at a site like ehow they have THOUSANDS of articles…and very few links to those articles. Their internal pages ranked because of domain authority.

But those lack of links to their internal pages probably helped Google determine that most of their content was crap.

I took a look at the Denver Nuggets Page link profile using ahrefs and it has external links from 2 domains.

2. Panda is mostly about repeated/rewritten content on the same site. Because the info on that page is unique to sportsmemorabilia.com, that may have also helped them escape the filter.

Reply

Perry February 7, 2013 at 4:20 pm

Hi Brian,

Thanks for your thoughtful comment. For some reason, Akismet thought it was Spam, which is why it didn’t get published right away.

For a while, I agreed with your assessment on #1. However, I’ve fixed Pandalized sites before and links have had nothing to do with it. Penguin on the other hand… ;-)

On your 2nd point: I wish Panda was only about repeated/rewritten content. Would make a lot of SEOs lives easier :-)

That layer of their algorithm is incredibly complex. Yes, repeated/boiler plate content is a factor. But even more-so, it’s about writing higher quality content, removing poorly written/underperforming content, re-writing crap content etc. Just because the content on that page was unique to their domain, doesn’t mean that they would escape Panda’s claws.

The User Experience on their site is very good. And it’s a trustworthy site. They have many elements moving in their favor to escape Panda. But regardless they are producing crap content and tooting their horn otherwise.

Reply

Jon @ Authority Website Income February 7, 2013 at 5:05 pm

Great analysis Perry, deconstructing another business is a great way to learn…unfortunately in this case an untrained eye might say write crappy articles and a lot of them!

I believe the reason this site didn’t get destroyed is because they do have other legitimate activities which gets them links from Bill Simmons as you pointed out. If all they were was crappy articles like the one you highlighted I am sure Google would have given them a swift Panda kick to the head.

Based on their stats it looks like the site has been hurt by Panda and subsequent updates…
http://authoritywebsiteincome.com/panda-update-on-sports-memorabilia-site-low-quality-content-doesnt-work/
(pciture showing Sports Memorabilia has been hurt by Google updates in 2012)

Reply

Perry February 7, 2013 at 6:58 pm

‘Unfortunately in this case an untrained eye might say write crappy articles and a lot of them!’ — Worked plenty good for way too long lol. Not anymore.

Thanks for the additional research. Definitely clear that Panda did (rightfully) hit them… I updated the article accordingly.

Reply

Youssef February 8, 2013 at 4:30 pm

Way to go Perry! We need more of this as we all try to learn from it.

I think sites that made it pass last couple years updates are free and clear. it’s almost like they got away with murder. They now have the ranking and traffic since all other sites are nowhere to be found.

Therefore, you can’t just look at a dated link profile and thin content and say I’ll just reverse engineer that…In other words, shortcut to SEO is there is no shortcut…or something like that…:)

Reply

Perry February 9, 2013 at 10:18 am

Thanks, Youssef! Always appreciate appreciation :-)

In my recent experience, reverse engineering still works very well. Not the only strategy to use, but it’s a good starting point… Particularly with links.

Reply

Alan March 2, 2013 at 4:03 pm

Excellent case study…thanks for sharing this information. I think the method for getting .edu backlinks is a great idea. I’m going try it out.

Thanks again for providing such valuable information.

Reply

Perry March 4, 2013 at 10:45 am

Hi Alan,

You’re welcome. Hope it works for you. It certainly is a little grey, but it works.

PS I removed your website link as I don’t allow URLs in my comments to anything that vaguely represents P-P-C. Thanks for your understanding.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: